I build something up by disturbing something
(destruction—structure—construction).
A system became necessary; how else could
I see more concentratedly, find some interest, continue at all? Contemplation had to be interrupted
by action as a means of accepting anything among everything. No acceptance at
all = chaos. In my work I try to move, to expand and contract as far as
possible between more or less known and unknown limits. I couldn’t talk about
any limits, I know generally, I just can say I feel at times closer while doing
a series or afterwards. But whether coming closer once or not, it is still one
experience. Whether positive or negative, I know it then. Everything is in so
far in a proof, for the negative that a positive exists, and vice versa.
A circle as a symbol of infinity, everything; what is beginning,
where? What is end, where?
I couldn’t recreate my so-called system; it
depends on things done previously. The materials consist of paper and pencil
with which I draw my conceptions, write words and numbers, which are the
simplest means for putting down my ideas; for ideas do not depend on materials.
The nature of ideas is immateriality.
Things have plenty of variations and varieties,
so they can be changed. At this moment I know about what I have done, what I am
doing; I shall see what will happen next.
This
statement, sent by Darboven to Lippard in 1968, is previously unpublished. It
is presently in Lucy R. Lippard papers, Archives of American Art, uncataloged
recent acquisition.
En: ALBERRO, Alexander,
Blake Stimson, Conceptual Art: A critical antology,
1a. Ed. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2000.
Hanne Darboven, Statement to Lucy Lippard, Pp. 62-63.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario